Ad system
gfp.veta.naver.com
All 153 apps that declare gfp.veta.naver.com hold a DIRECT account with it (24 app-ads.txt files). 80% of the 60 lines checked name an account its sellers.json (15 sellers) does not list.
- Apps declaring it
- 153
- Sellers in sellers.json
- 15
- Lines verified
- 20%
- Lines with errors
- 48
- Avg. supply path score
- 49.3 / 100
153 DIRECT · 0 RESELLER
0% confidential
12 of 60 checked lines
60 lines in total
153 apps scored
App counts, the sellers.json breakdown and the directory ranking are as of , recomputed daily (the same numbers as the directory). Line counts are recounted every 10 minutes. sellers.json last read 13 October 2026. The supply path score sums up how short and clean the declared paths are, 0 to 100 (how it is computed).
How to add gfp.veta.naver.com to app-ads.txt
One line per account, in the app-ads.txt at the root of the domain your App Store and Google Play listings name as the developer website.
gfp.veta.naver.com, YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID, DIRECT
gfp.veta.naver.com, YOUR_ACCOUNT_ID, RESELLER
- Field 1:
gfp.veta.naver.com, the domain gfp.veta.naver.com uses in app-ads.txt. - Field 2: your account ID with gfp.veta.naver.com. It must equal the
seller_idin gfp.veta.naver.com's sellers.json. - Field 3: DIRECT if you hold the account, RESELLER if a partner holds it and sells your inventory. DIRECT vs RESELLER
- Field 4 (optional): a certification authority ID. Most lines naming gfp.veta.naver.com carry none, or different ones, so we do not suggest one.
sellers.json at a glance
- Status
- Published
- Sellers listed
- 15
- Confidential
- 0 (0%)
- Passthrough
- 0
- Removed, last 30 days
- 0
- Last read
- Oct 13, 2026
- PUBLISHER15
- INTERMEDIARY0
- BOTH0
Cross-check of lines naming gfp.veta.naver.com
- Verified 12
- Seller ID not found 48
- DIRECT but intermediary 0
- RESELLER but publisher 0
- Seller type BOTH 0
- Confidential seller 0
- No sellers.json 0
- Unchecked 0
Every line naming gfp.veta.naver.com is looked up in its sellers.json. What each status means
Common errors with gfp.veta.naver.com lines
-
Seller ID not found
48 lines
Ask gfp.veta.naver.com for the account ID it lists for you in its sellers.json, correct the line, or remove it if you no longer work with them. Buyers that check sellers.json drop these paths.
Apps that declare gfp.veta.naver.com
| App | Store | Relationship | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| iOS | DIRECT | Live | |
| iOS | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| iOS | DIRECT | Live | |
| iOS | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live | |
| iOS | DIRECT | Live | |
| Android | DIRECT | Live |
Questions about gfp.veta.naver.com
Does gfp.veta.naver.com publish a sellers.json?
Yes. Its file at https://gfp.veta.naver.com/sellers.json listed 15 sellers when we last read it on 13 October 2026: 15 publishers, 0 intermediaries and 0 listed as both; 0% are confidential.
How many apps declare gfp.veta.naver.com in app-ads.txt?
153 apps in Stoqlab's data (delisted apps included) declare gfp.veta.naver.com: 153 with at least one DIRECT line and 0 with at least one RESELLER line, across 24 app-ads.txt files, as of 13 October 2026 (recounted daily).
Why do gfp.veta.naver.com lines fail verification?
Of 60 lines naming gfp.veta.naver.com, 48 contradict its sellers.json. The most common case is "Seller ID not found", on 48 lines. Ask gfp.veta.naver.com for the account ID it lists for you in its sellers.json, correct the line, or remove it if you no longer work with them. Buyers that check sellers.json drop these paths.
Not sure whether your line should say DIRECT or RESELLER? DIRECT vs RESELLER in app-ads.txt
Sources: the public app-ads.txt files of tracked apps and the sellers.json of gfp.veta.naver.com. Something wrong? Tell us.